{"id":4073,"date":"2015-02-03T22:03:27","date_gmt":"2015-02-03T22:03:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gcuclegacysite.wpengine.com\/?p=2007"},"modified":"2015-02-03T22:03:27","modified_gmt":"2015-02-03T22:03:27","slug":"cureforloneliness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gcuclegacysite.wpengine.com\/cureforloneliness\/","title":{"rendered":"Co-working Spaces: An Expensive Cure for Loneliness or an Inexpensive Solution for a Cool Office"},"content":{"rendered":"
Yesterday, Bloomberg.com ran a sensational, clickbait-y article entitled “Co-working Spaces; An Expensive Cure For Loneliness<\/a>” in which author Patrick Clark argues that coworking spaces (no hyphen necessary, y’all!) are expensive overpriced workspaces for chumps. As you can imagine, that didn’t sit well with us. The math was wrong! He missed the point! We understand that haters are going to hate and coworking has really come along way if anyone feels the need to write articles exposing the “dirty truth behind coworking.” We were when Nick Clark from the Common Desk<\/a> in Dallas responded with a blog post of his own<\/a>. We’ll let Nick take it from here…<\/em><\/p>\n Yesterday afternoon, Bloomberg published an article titled, \u201cCo-working: An Expensive Cure for Loneliness.\u201d The article attempts to break down coworking by the numbers. It cites that the average coworking dedicated desk costs $526 a month, more than seven times as much as a typical office space. The problem with these numbers is that they paint an incomplete picture.<\/p>\n Of course there are the intangibles of coworking. Nobody can argue the fact that a good coworking space provides a culture that is unmatched in the world of freelancers and small businesses, but let\u2019s push that aside for now and simply focus on the price of membership compared to a typical office lease.<\/p>\n To understand the numbers, you must first understand how a commercial office landlord calculates square footage. As a tenant of an office building, you have \u201cusable square feet\u201d being occupied, but you pay based on the \u201crentable square feet.\u201d<\/p>\n Usable square feet includes the specific area the tenant will occupy in order to do business. This includes all office space plus any storage or private restrooms. Rentable square feet, the space the tenant is financially responsible for, accounts for common areas such as corridors, building amenities, lobbies, stairways, restrooms and so on.<\/p>\n To calculate rentable square feet, landlords use what is called a \u201cload factor\u201d (also called a common area factor). The load factor is equal to \u201crentable square feet\u201d divided by \u201cusable square feet.\u201d An average load factor of a multi-tenant office building is around 15%. The idea is that, as a tenant of a multi-tenant building, you pay for your proportionate share of the common areas.<\/p>\n A commercial office building typically accommodates 3-5 people per 1,000 rentable square feet. Thanks to Bloomberg, we know that Midtown Manhattan\u2019s annualized office rents averaged close to $67 a square foot in the fourth quarter last year. If we assume an employee occupies approximately 250 rentable <\/em>square feet at $67 a square foot per year, the cost of that desk is approximately $1,396 per month. That is 2.65 times higher than the average cost of a dedicated desk at a coworking space.<\/p>\n The above math also assumes a full service lease, which is what you get at a coworking space. Almost all commercial leases now charge additional monthly fees for utilities, which is referred to as a \u201crent plus electricity\u201d lease. Some lease agreements make the tenant responsible for real estate taxes, building insurance, and maintenance as well. This lease type is referred to as a \u201ctriple net\u201d lease. These add-ons to base rent can easily lead to an additional $5 per square foot annually.<\/p>\n